3 ms·
This articles tone comes across as incredibly snide, sarcastic, and condescending. This is how it describes the impact theory: ‘Mystery solved’. ‘Scientists
by mr_toad 8y ago
This articles tone comes across as incredibly snide, sarcastic, and condescending. This is how it describes the impact theory:
‘Mystery solved’. ‘Scientists cheered’. ‘a heartwarming story about the integrity of the scientific method.’
It reads more like a snarky movie review than science journalism.
- chr1 8y ago'snide, sarcastic, and condescending' was not just the authors view, but the way involved scientists view theories of each other. So it's unfair to blame the article for that, which is an article about a scientist and not science in general.