This is also the case for bicycles, however it's purpose is more about dissuading cyclists who don't consider themselves guests on the pavement: > The introduc

This is also the case for bicycles, however it's purpose is more about dissuading cyclists who don't consider themselves guests on the pavement: > The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required. Pavements are for people, if you want to ride on it that is fine, but you have no right of way over people on foot. The carriage law should not be removed outright but amended similarly while making it clear it's not ok to make pavements dangerous for pedestrians.