4 ms·
Edit, FYI: When I posted this comment, the link title repeated the story's title "Math Proves John Lennon Wrote 'In My Life'". More like "arithmetic suggests"
by nanis 8y ago
Edit, FYI: When I posted this comment, the link title repeated the story's title "Math Proves John Lennon Wrote 'In My Life'".
More like "arithmetic suggests" ... There is no mathematical proof here.
See also [1]:
The model assumes correlated multinomial counts for the
bags-of-words as a function of authorship which is then
inverted using Bayes rule. Out-of-sample classification
accuracy for songs with known authorship was 80%. We
demonstrate the results to songs during the study
period with unknown authorship.
Radio interviews with the presenting author are listed on his web site[2].
[1]: https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2018/onlineprogram/AbstractDetails.cfm?abstractid=329336 https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2018/onlineprogram/Abstr...
[2]: http://www.glicko.net/ http://www.glicko.net/
- acqq 8y agoMy question is: Was the number of the samples relatively small? Both authors made much more music than only while being in the Beatles, and if the later songs (since the Beatles split) were also (or only!) used for training then I could imagine that such a training can be sufficient. But if only the Beatles songs were used, I suspect it could be possibly not enough to be completely sure. Moreover, I can imagine that the contribution to some songs was made by both in various phases, and that that could confuse the algorithm.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]