No, unfortunately it's perfectly capitalist. Because the premise of capitalism [1] is (extremely simplified) "help the capital holder because they will have mor

No, unfortunately it's perfectly capitalist. Because the premise of capitalism [1] is (extremely simplified) "help the capital holder because they will have more power to help the others". If an employer does better he will hire more people so more well being. Another basic capitalist concept is that politics should not influence capital but capital should influence politics. That's because who would know better how to make money and what's best: money makers or politicians? The idea is political interest can turn into unwise economic moves, but capitalist interest will always turn into wise economic moves. Why do you think lobbying isn't considered corruption? Because it's expected that politics needs a hand from business to make the right call. In practice this turns out how you see it today. The premise was solid, the implementation not so much. In communism state dictates and the business is at its mercy. In capitalism capital dictates and the state is at its mercy. See the QE as quieting up an unruly child by giving him what he wants. What else can you do, get another child? Sink your economy? It's still your own people you hurt in the end. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations