4 ms·
Because a static site generator running in a browser-container on your local machine is so much worse than using one hosted on someone else's server? Not a very
by adamrezich 8y ago
Because a static site generator running in a browser-container on your local machine is so much worse than using one hosted on someone else's server? Not a very useful comment.
- stephenr 8y ago> is so much worse It is. You lose the 'works anywhere' aspect of a web application, and the reasonable security policies of a modern browser executing the code in question. One of the strengths of a static site generator is that the content part is (usually) just flat files - you can edit them in basically anything.
- BobMitro 8y agoHi Stephner, in part, you're right; but Publii allows you to share the website files via e.g. Dropbox and manage your site by multiple authors. https://getpublii.com/docs/publii-on-multiple-computers-via-dropbox.html https://getpublii.com/docs/publii-on-multiple-computers-via-...
- stephenr 8y agoSo does literally any other file editor.
- adamrezich 8y agoWhat is gained from being this reductive?