4 ms·
> CC got rid of their non-attribution v1.0 licences in 2004, so since then there has been three options for people wanting to release art without requiring attr
by gioele 8y ago
> CC got rid of their non-attribution v1.0 licences in 2004, so since then there has been three options for people wanting to release art without requiring attribution:
But MIT requires attribution as well:
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
- lucideer 8y agoIANAL but my understanding is that the legal interpretation of that is that the copyright and permission notice doesn't (need to) include the name of the copyright holder.