> You DO know that the very word "Slavery" has a very specific meaning here in the United States, yes. It might to some people. I consider those people to be s

> You DO know that the very word "Slavery" has a very specific meaning here in the United States, yes. It might to some people. I consider those people to be somewhat wrong. Slavery has happened for a long time before Atlantic slave trade and didn't end with it. > Probably "bondage" or "indentured servitude" or "traffiking" or "imprisonment" combined with "forced labor" will more accurately describe what you're trying to communicate to American audiences. bondage: slavery or involuntary servitude; serfdom (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bondage https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bondage) > When the word "Slavery" is used in America, it only means institutionalized laws endorsed by The U.S. Government, to specifically target Black People and only Black People, and deny them a normal existence among peers. Ok? Other countries have had slavery until much later (e.g. India until 1970's). What's your point. The reason why American slavery is getting so much attention is due to the clear racial divide between the two classes of people. This somehow makes it more morally reprehensible than other forms of slavery? There's no trademark on the word "slavery" right? Stop making it seem like there is.