Wow this is surprising. With all due respect to the plaintiff and the suffering that he and his family are going through, my (limited) understanding is that the

Wow this is surprising. With all due respect to the plaintiff and the suffering that he and his family are going through, my (limited) understanding is that there just isn't enough evidence to show that his cancer was caused by exposure to Roundup. If there is anyone more well-versed on the subject who would like to make a case to the contrary I would be interested in learning more. This ruling, and the recent $4.7 billion ruling against Johnson & Johnson that baby powder causes cancer must have chemical and pharmaceutical companies terrified.