4 ms·
It is straightforward yes, but it doesn't allay any of my concerns. I doesn't describe the algorithms used, and it doesn't have a threat model or anything resem
by benchaney 8y ago
It is straightforward yes, but it doesn't allay any of my concerns. I doesn't describe the algorithms used, and it doesn't have a threat model or anything resembling security analysis. It is more about gauging the reactions and social implications of the work, than a hard technical paper.
This is a very important part of the process, but it doesn't address the issues I raised.
- jessaustin 8y agoYeah I agree they should release their source, but it's silly to hold that against the comment that didn't impress you.
- benchaney 8y ago> but it's silly to hold that against the comment that didn't impress you. I don't see why. I am still convinced there are security issues. The comment under discussion made all sorts of grandiose yet completely unsupported claims. If the paper he linked had backed up his assertions, I'd be inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, but it doesn't. Therefore I don't believe him.