>The parent comment was referring to the usage of sizeof(). Ah ok, makes more sense in re-reading now. I was lazy and went off of a child comment. >Also, the

>The parent comment was referring to the usage of sizeof(). Ah ok, makes more sense in re-reading now. I was lazy and went off of a child comment. >Also, the fact that they cast the result of malloc makes me think they were using a C++ compiler, which will complain that there's no cast. Definitely could be that.