3 ms·
I believe that there are ways around this. In the ideal world, such a focus on teacher evaluation wouldn't be necessary. One example: In Finland, from the be
by aik 16y ago
I believe that there are ways around this.
In the ideal world, such a focus on teacher evaluation wouldn't be necessary. One example: In Finland, from the beginning teachers receive maximum education themselves and so administrators trust their judgments. I realize we aren't there, but there may be other ways of getting there.
Firstly, what if all teachers were more motivated? What if all teachers had clear proof that their methods suck? What if clear evidence of superior methods that have clearly better results existed?
What if there was a piece of technology that was so attractive, showed such promise and proved better learning occurred, that teachers themselves took it up out of interest and started using it and improving on themselves and their learning through this new methodology. The lobbyists and the like would probably be against it, but with enough backing and proof of its benefits, they would lose.
Creating a product like this is the kind of technology and innovation we need, and I firmly believe it's possible.
- anamax 16y agoYou're assuming that the purpose of the public education system in the US is student education. The observed behavior suggests otherwise. I said lobbyists and teachers organizations, but teachers support them.... And, when evaluation comes up for a vote, teachers vote against it overwhelmingly. They strike to get rid of it, and so on. There are no technical solutions to social problems.