3 ms·
Accusing Vox of a hidden agenda and bad faith really isn't called for. And I don't see how the fact that healthier food, under some circumstances, can cost more
by autocorr 8y ago
Accusing Vox of a hidden agenda and bad faith really isn't called for. And I don't see how the fact that healthier food, under some circumstances, can cost more, is a controversial statement. The chart for point 4 even supports your point, since meat is the highest cost per 100 g.
But I think your comment is misplaced because the points of the article have almost nothing to do with vegan/meat choices. Taking meat out of the American diet would not significantly change the facts presented in the article. This is especially true for point 3, where we consume way, way too much (vegan) soda and (vegan) sugary beverages.
- gepi79 8y agoI do not think that the author of the article has a hidden agenda but mentioning that healthy food can cost more is either misleading or useless. Quote (of a lie): "Instead, there is a range of economic and social factors that make eating enough fruits and vegetables really hard." Of course it "can" cost more if you insist on buying only the most expensive vegan food available. Try to become obese on a cheap healthy whole food plant based diet and rice and potatoes and bread without much added sugar (= normal bread in Europe). The article offers no useful information to the reader and shifts all responsibility to the evil industry and claims that healthy food is too expensive and socially unacceptable and thus out of reach and not a solution. Can you find one benefit of the article that made you smarter or a better person ?