4 ms·
Yes but being a human they already have a pretty good idea what might be funny for the audience they want to perfmorm for. So basically I think a computer woul
by sgillen 8y ago
Yes but being a human they already have a pretty good idea what might be funny for the audience they want to perfmorm for.
So basically I think a computer would need a lot more trial and error than the human does, and I’m not sure a good way to allow for that magnitude of trial and error without having some other computer that has a sense of humor be the judge.
- Isamu 8y agoNo, you'd want to bootstrap the process with some kind of machine learning to categorize humor and non-humor. It would have poor accuracy, no doubt, but it would be better than random generation. I agree that it would be less efficient than in humans but with learning it might be able to converge on a set of strategies, possibly "cheats" that are likely to produce laughs.