4 ms·

Would you kindly provide recommendations? I'm looking for a sync service which can run on windows AND linux (which is why onedrive and google drive are out)...

Would you kindly provide recommendations? I'm looking for a sync service which can run on windows AND linux (which is why onedrive and google drive are out)...and i'm willing to pay a fair monthly fee.

swiley 8y ago
Just use syncthing. It works better, is open source, and runs on everything.
- acdha 8y ago
  Doesn't that require you to play sysadmin running your own servers?
  - xj9 8y ago
    syncthing is p2p, you just run it on the devices that you want to sync with
  - snerbles 8y ago
    No. There's already a peer-to-peer relay infrastructure in place for when your devices can't make direct connections to each other.
    - acdha 8y ago
      That sounds like the answer is actually yes because you have to run the various computers, provision enough storage to hold everything, secure them, and make sure you have a backup plan.
      - snerbles 8y ago
        > run the various computers That's a vague assertion that can apply to anything. > provision enough storage to hold everything Syncthing can ignore directories/patterns at the local level. > secure them And this notion somehow doesn't apply to your Dropbox credentials or shared folders? Furthermore, Dropbox has access to your data - with Syncthing that's limited only to the synchronized devices. > have a backup plan Another non-sequitur. Either tool can be part of a backup solution.
        acdha 8y ago
        > > run the various computers > > That's a vague assertion that can apply to anything. It's a very specific assertion which does not apply to every thing: with syncthing, you need to operate every piece of the system. With a cloud service, you are delegating that to other people, presumably professionals. That's a big difference for most people and it has significant implications for things like backups — e.g. if someone breaks into your house and steals two computers, did you just lose every copy of your data? > > provision enough storage to hold everything > > Syncthing can ignore directories/patterns at the local level. That's an unrelated topic. This is about the total size of your data and whether it fits on multiple devices without inconvenience. If you have a phone and a laptop, do you have enough storage for a full copy of everything? If not, you need to add a third computer, deal with external drives, etc. One appeal of cloud services for many people is that you can save your data without needing to have enough space to have a full local copy and still be able to access it. > > secure them > > And this notion somehow doesn't apply to your Dropbox credentials or shared folders? Furthermore, Dropbox has access to your data - with Syncthing that's limited only to the synchronized devices. Again, this is a comparison question. A service has a separate security trust boundary so someone who compromises your account doesn't get infrastructure-level access and cannot permanently delete things without you having a chance to recover. If you're doing it yourself, you're taking on that responsibility entirely yourself. Maybe you're confident with that, maybe you're not but it's something that you absolutely have to think about for a data storage system. > > have a backup plan > > Another non-sequitur. Either tool can be part of a backup solution. You might want to check the definition of non-sequitur – it's not a get-out-of-jail-free card for avoiding an answer. Just to reiterate, ask what happens if your hard drive starts corrupting blocks, someone steals your computer, your house burns down, you get malware which encrypts every file on your computer, etc. With Dropbox the answer is “I buy a new computer and restore my data. Since the malware couldn't overwrite the older copies, I lost nothing”. If you're self-hosting, that could have the same answer but it requires more skills and ongoing commitment to do things like off-site backups. What I've found to be sadly common is that people do these comparisons without actually matching equivalent levels of service and then get a painful educational lesson when something goes wrong and they lose something they cared about.
        8y ago
      - siegecraft 8y ago
        If you want absolute feature parity with dropbox, then yes I suppose you do. But you don't have to stand up a server just to sync files between your devices.
      - Shish2k 8y ago
        > run the various computers Are you saying dropbox works without computers O_o? > provision enough storage to hold everything It's true that on all your clients put together, you need enough space to have one copy of your data; where for dropbox you can have one single sparse checkout and let their servers hold the full data set. I've never seen that be an issue in practice though - on the contrary, my laptops have enough space to hold all my data, and my dropbox account doesn't, which is why I went to syncthing in the first place. > secure them What security do you need to add to syncthing that you don't need for dropbox? > make sure you have a backup plan I guess dropbox counts as having offsite backup implicitly; personally I'm using syncthing between a few laptops and desktops in different locations and counting that as the off-site backup plan.
        acdha 8y ago
        > > run the various computers > > Are you saying dropbox works without computers O_o? I'm saying that Dropbox does not require you to run every computer yourself. If your house burns, floods, gets burgled, etc. not losing every copy is a really nice benefit for the average person. Not needing to make sure that their laptop is running at the same time as a desktop computer is similarly nice for being able to depend on having n > 1 copies. > > provision enough storage to hold everything > > It's true that on all your clients put together, you need enough space to have one copy of your data; where for dropbox you can have one single sparse checkout and let their servers hold the full data set. I've never seen that be an issue in practice though - on the contrary, my laptops have enough space to hold all my data, and my dropbox account doesn't, which is why I went to syncthing in the first place. It definitely depends on the user and is less of a problem as SSDs get larger but I definitely know people who had things like large photo/video libraries which they didn't want to have taking up 80% of storage on every computer they own. > > secure them > > What security do you need to add to syncthing that you don't need for dropbox? Two aspects: one is relatively low-impact but still worth making sure you're comfortable with any risk of data loss. If you use FDE on your phone / laptop but someone steals the desktop which has all of your synced data on it, is that a problem? Do you forensically wipe drives before getting rid of them? Dropbox's data is encrypted at rest and since they're hosted in a proper data center you don't have to worry about someone stealing a copy as easily as breaking into someone's apartment. The other is more important now that ransomware is an industry: if you get malware, how robust are your recovery options? Simple versioning doesn't help if, say, the malware touches a file multiple times or if the versioning system wasn't designed to handle malice and so e.g. an attacker can just empty the trash or overwrite the old versions too. One nice thing about the hosted model is that it has a completely different trust chain so even if you're totally compromised it doesn't allow them infrastructure-level access. That's far from perfect but enough people have recovered deleted Gmail messages, Dropbox files, etc. that it's worth asking whether you're comfortable about your data recovery options in any comparison. > > make sure you have a backup plan > > I guess dropbox counts as having offsite backup implicitly; personally I'm using syncthing between a few laptops and desktops in different locations and counting that as the off-site backup plan. That probably works for most scenarios other than a bad security compromise but how frequently do you verify those copies? Does syncthing have checksums to ensure that the copy you think you have hasn't been corrupted? Again, I'm not saying that syncthing is a bad choice, only that “It works better” is a very broad claim which is clearly not true as a general statement. Convenience and reliability have significant value to most people.
- jonknee 8y ago
  I guess you could say it runs of everything unless you use one of the two most popular operating systems in the world: Android and iOS.
  - cesarb 8y ago
    There's syncthing for Android: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-android https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-android
    - jonknee 8y ago
      Whoops, the website could make that more clear. "Works on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris and OpenBSD."
    - anotherevan 8y ago
      Only recently started playing with SyncThing (about the time SpiderOak's warrant canary expired). To my mind, the Android app leaves a bit to be desired. Usually you don't want your phone to hold local copies of everything in the shared folder(s) as it is usually space constrained. You want to be able to view and pull files down as desired (possibly with the option to flag individual files to always be cached locally).
  - Fnoord 8y ago
    Not sure what you're on about, its right in F-Droid [1]. What is or isn't on iOS is in Apple's control. I recommend to take a look at Nextcloud. You can use it to control your own files, calendar, etc without some third party using it for data mining. [1] https://staging.f-droid.org/search?q=syncthing&lang=en https://staging.f-droid.org/search?q=syncthing&lang=en
  - swiley 8y ago
    It runs very well on android with termux. Like most open source software: don't bother with the "apps" just install it in termux the same way you would on any other computer.
justinclift 8y ago
rsync.net seems to get mentioned around here every now and again. I haven't used them though personally, so not sure of good/bad/etc. Unlike what their name (rsync) suggests, they do seem to support Windows clients and aren't *nix only: https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows.html https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows.html
- mxuribe 8y ago
  Same here, I had heard rsync.net mentioned previously...HOWEVER, i did NOT know they had a windows client. Thanks!
- lreeves 8y ago
  The documentation for the Windows client (1) almost seems like a joke. In the screenshots the text gets cut off in the UI, there's sentences that say "don't use this versioning feature we're about to talk about" and tons of text that's been striked-through. There's also zero mention if the client supports backing up open files via volume shadow snapshots which is basically requirement number one for any Windows backup client. 1 - https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows_backup_agent.html https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows_backup_agent.h...
  - rsync 8y ago
    We're really all about the direct unix to unix connection. The point of rsync.net is that you can log onto any unix system, anywhere, and interact with your cloud storage - with no software installation or configuration necessary. The Windows Backup Agent works very well and has recently been updated but the documentation you are seeing reflects the fact that it is a secondary function here at rsync.net that is mostly provided for the convenience of customers in mixed environments. We are not a dropbox alternative.
- znelis 8y ago
  I had a pretty underwhelming experience with rsync.net and their cheaper version without snapshots a year ago. Speeds where initially 1MB/s on a gigabit connection between Sweden and their Switzerland location. After complaining they exempted me from traffic shaping and I got 2-4MB/s instead.
Chilinot 8y ago
I would recommend Syncthing. Fully open source. It is however self-hosted. But they have clients for basically everything, including mobile phones.
- mxuribe 8y ago
  I used to run syncthing...but about 1 year ago (when i started with current employer) they blocked it. i forgot what port it uses, but my employer gave me the ol' wag of the finger for "using an unauthorized app". Funny how dropbox was not blocked but syncthing was.
  - Spivak 8y ago
    Welcome to the world where everything except 80/443 is blocked. Sucks but you can still make things work.
- Avamander 8y ago
  It doesn't support symbolic links at all, deal breaker for me. I can't afford to start duplicating content just because it can't follow a symlink.
  - Chilinot 8y ago
    Have you tried hard links?
austurist 8y ago
What about Adrive? They don't have Linux client, but they support WebDAV, rsync, (S)FTP(S). I guess, getting some pretty stable client for these protocols won't be a challange.

swiley 8y ago

Just use syncthing. It works better, is open source, and runs on everything.

acdha 8y ago
Doesn't that require you to play sysadmin running your own servers?
- xj9 8y ago
  syncthing is p2p, you just run it on the devices that you want to sync with
- snerbles 8y ago
  No. There's already a peer-to-peer relay infrastructure in place for when your devices can't make direct connections to each other.
  - acdha 8y ago
    That sounds like the answer is actually yes because you have to run the various computers, provision enough storage to hold everything, secure them, and make sure you have a backup plan.
    - snerbles 8y ago
      > run the various computers That's a vague assertion that can apply to anything. > provision enough storage to hold everything Syncthing can ignore directories/patterns at the local level. > secure them And this notion somehow doesn't apply to your Dropbox credentials or shared folders? Furthermore, Dropbox has access to your data - with Syncthing that's limited only to the synchronized devices. > have a backup plan Another non-sequitur. Either tool can be part of a backup solution.
      - acdha 8y ago
        > > run the various computers > > That's a vague assertion that can apply to anything. It's a very specific assertion which does not apply to every thing: with syncthing, you need to operate every piece of the system. With a cloud service, you are delegating that to other people, presumably professionals. That's a big difference for most people and it has significant implications for things like backups — e.g. if someone breaks into your house and steals two computers, did you just lose every copy of your data? > > provision enough storage to hold everything > > Syncthing can ignore directories/patterns at the local level. That's an unrelated topic. This is about the total size of your data and whether it fits on multiple devices without inconvenience. If you have a phone and a laptop, do you have enough storage for a full copy of everything? If not, you need to add a third computer, deal with external drives, etc. One appeal of cloud services for many people is that you can save your data without needing to have enough space to have a full local copy and still be able to access it. > > secure them > > And this notion somehow doesn't apply to your Dropbox credentials or shared folders? Furthermore, Dropbox has access to your data - with Syncthing that's limited only to the synchronized devices. Again, this is a comparison question. A service has a separate security trust boundary so someone who compromises your account doesn't get infrastructure-level access and cannot permanently delete things without you having a chance to recover. If you're doing it yourself, you're taking on that responsibility entirely yourself. Maybe you're confident with that, maybe you're not but it's something that you absolutely have to think about for a data storage system. > > have a backup plan > > Another non-sequitur. Either tool can be part of a backup solution. You might want to check the definition of non-sequitur – it's not a get-out-of-jail-free card for avoiding an answer. Just to reiterate, ask what happens if your hard drive starts corrupting blocks, someone steals your computer, your house burns down, you get malware which encrypts every file on your computer, etc. With Dropbox the answer is “I buy a new computer and restore my data. Since the malware couldn't overwrite the older copies, I lost nothing”. If you're self-hosting, that could have the same answer but it requires more skills and ongoing commitment to do things like off-site backups. What I've found to be sadly common is that people do these comparisons without actually matching equivalent levels of service and then get a painful educational lesson when something goes wrong and they lose something they cared about.
        8y ago
    - siegecraft 8y ago
      If you want absolute feature parity with dropbox, then yes I suppose you do. But you don't have to stand up a server just to sync files between your devices.
    - Shish2k 8y ago
      > run the various computers Are you saying dropbox works without computers O_o? > provision enough storage to hold everything It's true that on all your clients put together, you need enough space to have one copy of your data; where for dropbox you can have one single sparse checkout and let their servers hold the full data set. I've never seen that be an issue in practice though - on the contrary, my laptops have enough space to hold all my data, and my dropbox account doesn't, which is why I went to syncthing in the first place. > secure them What security do you need to add to syncthing that you don't need for dropbox? > make sure you have a backup plan I guess dropbox counts as having offsite backup implicitly; personally I'm using syncthing between a few laptops and desktops in different locations and counting that as the off-site backup plan.
      - acdha 8y ago
        > > run the various computers > > Are you saying dropbox works without computers O_o? I'm saying that Dropbox does not require you to run every computer yourself. If your house burns, floods, gets burgled, etc. not losing every copy is a really nice benefit for the average person. Not needing to make sure that their laptop is running at the same time as a desktop computer is similarly nice for being able to depend on having n > 1 copies. > > provision enough storage to hold everything > > It's true that on all your clients put together, you need enough space to have one copy of your data; where for dropbox you can have one single sparse checkout and let their servers hold the full data set. I've never seen that be an issue in practice though - on the contrary, my laptops have enough space to hold all my data, and my dropbox account doesn't, which is why I went to syncthing in the first place. It definitely depends on the user and is less of a problem as SSDs get larger but I definitely know people who had things like large photo/video libraries which they didn't want to have taking up 80% of storage on every computer they own. > > secure them > > What security do you need to add to syncthing that you don't need for dropbox? Two aspects: one is relatively low-impact but still worth making sure you're comfortable with any risk of data loss. If you use FDE on your phone / laptop but someone steals the desktop which has all of your synced data on it, is that a problem? Do you forensically wipe drives before getting rid of them? Dropbox's data is encrypted at rest and since they're hosted in a proper data center you don't have to worry about someone stealing a copy as easily as breaking into someone's apartment. The other is more important now that ransomware is an industry: if you get malware, how robust are your recovery options? Simple versioning doesn't help if, say, the malware touches a file multiple times or if the versioning system wasn't designed to handle malice and so e.g. an attacker can just empty the trash or overwrite the old versions too. One nice thing about the hosted model is that it has a completely different trust chain so even if you're totally compromised it doesn't allow them infrastructure-level access. That's far from perfect but enough people have recovered deleted Gmail messages, Dropbox files, etc. that it's worth asking whether you're comfortable about your data recovery options in any comparison. > > make sure you have a backup plan > > I guess dropbox counts as having offsite backup implicitly; personally I'm using syncthing between a few laptops and desktops in different locations and counting that as the off-site backup plan. That probably works for most scenarios other than a bad security compromise but how frequently do you verify those copies? Does syncthing have checksums to ensure that the copy you think you have hasn't been corrupted? Again, I'm not saying that syncthing is a bad choice, only that “It works better” is a very broad claim which is clearly not true as a general statement. Convenience and reliability have significant value to most people.
jonknee 8y ago
I guess you could say it runs of everything unless you use one of the two most popular operating systems in the world: Android and iOS.
- cesarb 8y ago
  There's syncthing for Android: https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-android https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing-android
  - jonknee 8y ago
    Whoops, the website could make that more clear. "Works on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris and OpenBSD."
  - anotherevan 8y ago
    Only recently started playing with SyncThing (about the time SpiderOak's warrant canary expired). To my mind, the Android app leaves a bit to be desired. Usually you don't want your phone to hold local copies of everything in the shared folder(s) as it is usually space constrained. You want to be able to view and pull files down as desired (possibly with the option to flag individual files to always be cached locally).
- Fnoord 8y ago
  Not sure what you're on about, its right in F-Droid [1]. What is or isn't on iOS is in Apple's control. I recommend to take a look at Nextcloud. You can use it to control your own files, calendar, etc without some third party using it for data mining. [1] https://staging.f-droid.org/search?q=syncthing&lang=en https://staging.f-droid.org/search?q=syncthing&lang=en
- swiley 8y ago
  It runs very well on android with termux. Like most open source software: don't bother with the "apps" just install it in termux the same way you would on any other computer.

justinclift 8y ago

rsync.net seems to get mentioned around here every now and again. I haven't used them though personally, so not sure of good/bad/etc. Unlike what their name (rsync) suggests, they do seem to support Windows clients and aren't *nix only: https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows.html https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows.html

mxuribe 8y ago
Same here, I had heard rsync.net mentioned previously...HOWEVER, i did NOT know they had a windows client. Thanks!
lreeves 8y ago
The documentation for the Windows client (1) almost seems like a joke. In the screenshots the text gets cut off in the UI, there's sentences that say "don't use this versioning feature we're about to talk about" and tons of text that's been striked-through. There's also zero mention if the client supports backing up open files via volume shadow snapshots which is basically requirement number one for any Windows backup client. 1 - https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows_backup_agent.html https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/windows_backup_agent.h...
- rsync 8y ago
  We're really all about the direct unix to unix connection. The point of rsync.net is that you can log onto any unix system, anywhere, and interact with your cloud storage - with no software installation or configuration necessary. The Windows Backup Agent works very well and has recently been updated but the documentation you are seeing reflects the fact that it is a secondary function here at rsync.net that is mostly provided for the convenience of customers in mixed environments. We are not a dropbox alternative.
znelis 8y ago
I had a pretty underwhelming experience with rsync.net and their cheaper version without snapshots a year ago. Speeds where initially 1MB/s on a gigabit connection between Sweden and their Switzerland location. After complaining they exempted me from traffic shaping and I got 2-4MB/s instead.

Chilinot 8y ago

I would recommend Syncthing. Fully open source. It is however self-hosted. But they have clients for basically everything, including mobile phones.

mxuribe 8y ago
I used to run syncthing...but about 1 year ago (when i started with current employer) they blocked it. i forgot what port it uses, but my employer gave me the ol' wag of the finger for "using an unauthorized app". Funny how dropbox was not blocked but syncthing was.
- Spivak 8y ago
  Welcome to the world where everything except 80/443 is blocked. Sucks but you can still make things work.
Avamander 8y ago
It doesn't support symbolic links at all, deal breaker for me. I can't afford to start duplicating content just because it can't follow a symlink.
- Chilinot 8y ago
  Have you tried hard links?

austurist 8y ago

What about Adrive? They don't have Linux client, but they support WebDAV, rsync, (S)FTP(S). I guess, getting some pretty stable client for these protocols won't be a challange.