> but the sky didn't fall. You are trying to confuse two things - suppression of economic growth and total collapse of the economics, and claiming since the la

> but the sky didn't fall. You are trying to confuse two things - suppression of economic growth and total collapse of the economics, and claiming since the latter didn't happen it proves no claim of the former could be ever true. It doesn't work that way. > Additionally you seem to think we can reward people for sequestering carbon, where do you propose this reward comes from? If you think it's important to do it, and many people like you do so, you could all chip in. We have some very wealthy people, billionaires, and more than one, that support doing something about this. Surely paying some money is the easiest way for them of doing something one could ever imagine.