3 ms·
If you haven't yet, you should check out a build of 1.0. The start-up time is _greatly_ improved. Basic startup time is twice as fast as ipython for me now:
by staticfloat 8y ago
If you haven't yet, you should check out a build of 1.0. The start-up time is _greatly_ improved. Basic startup time is twice as fast as ipython for me now:
$ time ipython -c '1+1'
Out[1]: 2
real 0m0.493s
user 0m0.401s
sys 0m0.063s
$ time julia -e '1+1'
real 0m0.222s
user 0m0.115s
sys 0m0.101s
Yes, python itself is still much faster. I compare against ipython just because that used to be my go-to interactive shell for technical computing.
- ivirshup 8y agoThat's pretty cool! I never had to much of an issue with the startup time for interactive computing though. It mainly has come up as an issue when I was writing short scripts that could be run a couple dozen times in serial. The real question is how long does `using Plots` take in v1.0?