3 ms·
>"It should use both", you say. Signal disagrees. That makes Signal evil, according to your argument. You're oversimplifying this. For the full rebuttal, refer
by ddevault 8y ago
>"It should use both", you say. Signal disagrees. That makes Signal evil, according to your argument.
You're oversimplifying this. For the full rebuttal, refer to the article.
>Signal doesn't.
You cannot know this. We don't need to have this conversation in two places, I'll just link it for others who want to follow along:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17726574 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17726574
>I'm satisfied that I've represented your argument well.
I don't think so.
>People can simply read your comment on the thread
Fair enough: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17724300 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17724300
Full disclosure: I added the text in the parenthesis and the second paragraph of this comment about an hour after it was initially posted.
- tptacek 8y agoI don't think you understand that I can, in fact, just observe that Signal disagrees with you, without making a point-by-point rebuttal of your argument. Similarly, you don't indicate anywhere that you understand that Moxie can do the same without acting in bad faith, which is something you accuse him of doing. You don't get to demand from strangers a debate on terms of your choosing.