2 ms·
I disagree. A Masters with thesis is more directed, a good way to learn how to do research, and not hinged on a novel contribution for a successful defense. My
by glitchc 8y ago
I disagree. A Masters with thesis is more directed, a good way to learn how to do research, and not hinged on a novel contribution for a successful defense. My PhD went much faster and smoother because I had learnt the ropes and decided it was something worth doing.
I think part of the problem is people jumping straight into PhD without any research experience. I watched quite a few students struggle when taking this road.
I do agree that it's a problem if grad school costs money, but a large stipend is only really available in STEM or medicine.
- godelski 8y agoIn my experience PhD candidates always get paid, and Masters don't. They do sometimes, but you aren't priority and guaranteed. I do always suggest getting the Masters on the way though. 5 years is a long time, and if you decide it isn't for you, well you come out with something (and it was paid).