That feeling when an article published by one of the largest professional engineering organizations in the world has no data to support its claims. Also, what

That feeling when an article published by one of the largest professional engineering organizations in the world has no data to support its claims. Also, what does this even mean: >It’s likely no accident that women, underrepresented minorities, LGBTQ people, and other underrepresented groups in the tech industry are among the more prominent voices speaking out through recruitment channels, Luo says. Why is that no accident? Is there some different moral matrix people who belong to these groups judges the world by? Is there any evidence to support that claim (or whatever claim they're trying to make). So glad I dropped my IEEE membership (I used to get this trash mailed to me). And for the record, the claims could very well be true, but the article does nothing to prove it, other than using two people as an example. And I wouldn't be surprised to learn they were invented (or friends of the author).