4 ms·
To put things in perspective, though, Zuckerberg is CEO of an international company that's constantly under attack by state-sponsored actors. He also spends $1
by Mr_P 8y ago
To put things in perspective, though, Zuckerberg is CEO of an international company that's constantly under attack by state-sponsored actors. He also spends $10 million on physical security.
In contrast, a non-famous person probably doesn't have as much to worry about, hence why I personally don't cover my smartphone camera.
- MatthiasP 8y agoPretending to be interesting enough to be spied on is one of the main reasons why people care about their cyber security.
- RobertRoberts 8y agoNone of my computers or servers mean anything to anyone, they are essentially anonymous. But they are all attacked daily. Do you think no one should cover their cameras because they "believe" they aren't under attack?
- bausshf 8y agoI second this. On one of my sites that barely has 1000 visitors a week, I still have to deal with 1000¨'s of requests every day from "hackers" lol.
- kapauldo 8y agoThe opposite of what you said
- bradknowles 8y agoIs it paranoia for me to lock my front door, because no one has ever tried to open it without my permission?
- auganov 8y agoMaybe? I usually don't lock the door when I'm at my original house. If I gained notoriety I'd probably be more inclined to lock it.
- RobertRoberts 8y agoJust to add to the discussion about how easy it can be to access someone's personal device: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/08/10/2143219/crestron-touchscreens-could-spy-on-hotel-rooms-meetings https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/08/10/2143219/crestron-tou... This is just _one_ vulnerability from one company...