4 ms·

But once it came out, once he was actually caught feeding semen to students, it was STILL hard to fire him. Sure, you can make a case that management failed to

But once it came out, once he was actually caught feeding semen to students, it was STILL hard to fire him. Sure, you can make a case that management failed to document his previous behavior so they had to start over from zero and document, counsel, coach, whatever the contract requires, but once he was actually busted for ejaculating in kids food - how is it reasonable that they couldn't fire him on the spot?

dragonwriter 8y ago
> But once it came out, once he was actually caught feeding semen to students He wasn't actually caught (or even formally accused of by the district in its dismissal charges) doing that. Everything that came out and was cited as the basis for his dismissal was the result of a photo lab reporting pictures, and in the charges for dismissal what is identified as being on the cookies is “an unidentified milky-white substance”. Notably, none of the reports of sexual abuse that students identified were made around the same time to school officials, or even the reported sexual context of the events in the photographs used as the basis for dismissal charges, were even referenced in those (exceedingly nonspecific) charges. The management failures continued into the suspension and firing process.