4 ms·

Julia 1.0 will be rough until major packages have caught up with the deprecations introduced in 1.0 and 0.7. 1.0 does not tolerate these deprecations, while 0.

Julia 1.0 will be rough until major packages have caught up with the deprecations introduced in 1.0 and 0.7. 1.0 does not tolerate these deprecations, while 0.7 will warn about them. This makes a poor first day impression for new users who expect Plots.jl, IPython.jl, Juno.jl or other prominent packages in 1.0. The package maintainers are scrambling to catch up. I recommend using 0.7 for a couple weeks until the community catches up unless you are proficient enough to contribute PRs and help out. (edit) To be clear, 0.7 was released at the same time as 1.0.

3JPLW 8y ago
The core devs are in on the scrambling, too! This is now one of my favorite interactions on GitHub: https://github.com/JuliaStats/StatsBase.jl/pull/404 https://github.com/JuliaStats/StatsBase.jl/pull/404
j605 8y ago
TBH even jupyter broke due to recent python update but people are not jumping on python, https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter_console/issues/163 https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter_console/issues/163