5 ms·
This is a rather poor essay. "Many academics enter science to change the world for the better. Yet it can often feel like contemporary academia is more about c
by andreyk 8y ago
This is a rather poor essay.
"Many academics enter science to change the world for the better. Yet it can often feel like contemporary academia is more about chasing citations. Most academic work is shared only with a particular scientific community, rather than policymakers or businesses, which makes it entirely disconnected from practice.
...
This new PhD would see students go out into the field and talk to practitioners from day one of their research, rather than spending the first year (or more) reading obscure academic literature."
So... do industry research? Let's be clear: a PhD is a training program for research. As such most research done during a PhD is generally not that impactful, certainly not to go beyond fellow academics and to non experts. In my experience most people who go into it don't have much of an idea of what they want to do afterward -- they mainly know they enjoy research and are interested in the topic. AFTER a PhD is finished they can go on and try to influence society using their skills, or not.
- jvanderbot 8y ago> AFTER a PhD is finished they can go on and try to influence society using their skills, or not. Exactly this. The primary skill developed during a PhD (for me, and those around me), is knowing the difference between: 1. solutions that can be pulled from literature (bake), 2. solutions that should be easy to assemble from existing solutions (buy), 3. what technology requires a small-to-medium delta above and beyond the bleeding edge (build) All those are research, but far too often (3) is what everyone targets.
- frankling_ 8y agoIf all three of these are research, what is engineering?
- ThalesX 8y agoI guess research deals with solutions under ideal conditions while engineering deals with real life constraint solutions?