Yep; I'm aware of all of that. I'm glad that the open source community is getting involved and I want to see these things help move the industry forward. My c

Yep; I'm aware of all of that. I'm glad that the open source community is getting involved and I want to see these things help move the industry forward. My comments were to the parent who presumes 1. To know what is best for diabetics 2. The device is inherently less risky than current options Nightscout absolutely would not get through FDA approvals today if for nothing other than catastrophic failures. I love the features and think it's way more robust than what is provided by Dexcom, but at the end of the day, I switched back to Dexcom's receiver and app because it doesn't crash. OpenAPS is great, but requires a level of research and effort than many patients aren't capable of. Then on top of this OpenAPS has this nice disclaimer as an opener, "By proceeding to use these tools or any openaps repositories, you agree to abide by the copyright agreement and release any contributors from any liability." Now I understand why that statement is there, but when someone dies using this "product" that hasn't been approved by the FDA; well let's just say I hope all parties involved have really good umbrella policies, because I'm not too sure that's going to hold up in a court of law.