5 ms·
I used to use this feature. It meant that I didn't have to log in to Facebook to re-post the thing I already posted on Twitter. If I still used this feature, I'
by daveFNbuck 8y ago
I used to use this feature. It meant that I didn't have to log in to Facebook to re-post the thing I already posted on Twitter. If I still used this feature, I'd be upset that Facebook just took a step to make my life a little bit harder.
In general, I care more about my own convenience than some incremental step against bots that probably won't noticeably impact my experience on the site.
- donalhunt 8y agoI agree - I see a lot of small business, even individuals from music/art circles what don't want to spend an inordinate amount of time keeping "followers" up to date... If they can create and share once but have the computers syndicate that to the places that matter, they've found a happy balance. The issue with the current model is that it's easily abused by bad actors (pun intended) to cram content down people's eye sockets.
- daveFNbuck 8y agoI haven't used Facebook in a while, but can't you just not follow the accounts that spam bad content?
- athenot 8y agoI'm in the same boat. It would apprear they realized that they are loosing advertizing eyeballs. Just checked, this also affects Buffer¹. Well, if they are making a push to lock people into their platform, this might make me back off further. ¹https://faq.buffer.com/article/985-publish-facebook-profiles https://faq.buffer.com/article/985-publish-facebook-profiles