5 ms·
> But AMP is a standard. AMP's website defines it as a library: https://www.ampproject.org/learn/overview/ https://www.ampproject.org/learn/overview/
by growtofill 8y ago
> But AMP is a standard.
AMP's website defines it as a library: https://www.ampproject.org/learn/overview/ https://www.ampproject.org/learn/overview/
- danShumway 8y agoMeh. For all practical purposes, it serves the exact same role as a standard. It's a set of rules/technologies that developers have to follow in order to get preferential treatment in Google search. I don't particularly care whether anyone thinks that's technically a standard or a framework or a library by the ridged definition or not; at the point we start down that rabbit hole we're just talking about words, not concepts. What I was trying to get at above was that any problems people bring up around Google profiling websites for search placement are still present in AMP. Forcing developers to use a specific set of technologies is functionally the same as forcing them to conform to a ridged set of benchmarks. For the purposes of this discussion, we might as well call AMP a standard.