3 ms·
It’s worry some that people have shifted their focus to unedited and often fairly anonymous sources for news. HN is honestly a good example as well. I’ve writt
by eksemplar 8y ago
It’s worry some that people have shifted their focus to unedited and often fairly anonymous sources for news. HN is honestly a good example as well.
I’ve written numerous upvoted posts sharing information about the Scandinavian public sector and tech-management, but I’m not a vetted source. I mean, you can’t even tell if I’m Scandinavian from HN.
My squabbling is relatively harmless of course, but it’s not always like this. If I was a different person I could’ve spent my time writing anti-vaccination stuff on another media, and people would have put the same sort of trust in my words. Not HN users, at least I’d like to think so, but a lot of people would have.
That’s insanely dangerous to a free society, because we rely on truth, and right now there really isn’t a lot of it going around.
- jkalo 8y agoTrue. I think ppl think the Russians or who ever have to create content farms to spread fud. All bad actors have to do is find lunatics with fringe views and keep upvoting. Media and social media are trained like lab rats to pick up anything that is getting views and amplify it. The underlying architecture has to change. The feedback mechanisms that drive this must be slowed down or removed.
- spookthesunset 8y ago> All bad actors have to do is find lunatics with fringe views and keep upvoting. Or just get bots / click farmers to do all the work. The crackpots will latch on eventually...