Issues with Gmail IMAP as voiced by other people: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16951363 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16951363 https://www.dvra

Issues with Gmail IMAP as voiced by other people: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16951363 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16951363 https://www.dvratil.cz/2014/06/improved-gmail-integration-in-kde-pim-4-14/ https://www.dvratil.cz/2014/06/improved-gmail-integration-in... https://productforums.google.com/d/msg/gmail/9A5oYELFbu8/7iq7WTVrBAAJ https://productforums.google.com/d/msg/gmail/9A5oYELFbu8/7iq... https://github.com/mscdex/node-imap/issues/71 https://github.com/mscdex/node-imap/issues/71 https://freron.lighthouseapp.com/projects/58672/tickets/1247-gmail-labels-with-non-ascii-characters-not-working#ticket-1247-7 https://freron.lighthouseapp.com/projects/58672/tickets/1247... Sure you can still access Gmail through IMAP, but if it works differently enough that using a standard IMAP client feels cumbersome and unfamiliar, is it really anything else than a vehicle to tell people that they should really just use the "better" Google product directly? That said, my original wording of "requiring" the Gmail API was poor and I should have phrased it more accurately.