4 ms·
The counter-argument to that is that the public benefit vs. compensation aspect is massively biased: http://cityobservatory.org/e-scooters-and-paying-for-roads/
by jpetso 8y ago
The counter-argument to that is that the public benefit vs. compensation aspect is massively biased: http://cityobservatory.org/e-scooters-and-paying-for-roads/ http://cityobservatory.org/e-scooters-and-paying-for-roads/
I'm really not a fan of companies flouting the law, but Atlanta complaining about bad use of space by vehicles is like Trump complaining about the lack of fact-checkers in journalism. If you're going to make regulations, there should be some semblance of equitable treatment for all involved.