4 ms·
What's wrong with that?
by jotm 8y ago
What's wrong with that?
- btilly 8y agoAll four named authors were communists. In attempting to demonstrate diversity, they accidentally demonstrated the opposite. It would be like bragging about the diversity of people that you listen to today, and then listing Bill O’Reilly, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and Tucker Carlson. Yes, that's a lot of work by a bunch of different people, but you're not really getting exposed to the full range of thought in our culture.
- Nasrudith 8y agoIt also doesn't fit in with even 'covering the high novelty/obscure ones' like if he listed say Georgists, and Mercantalists, and Cameralists.
- lainga 8y agoWell, it's not exactly everything, is it?
- bitwize 8y agoHe has wide, eclectic musical tastes too -- country and western.
- mturmon 8y ago“Everything from A to C.” More seriously, reading these writers is really basic stuff for any humanities graduate curriculum...and the book under review is authored by a well-known Oxford don.
- paganel 8y agoFor what it’s worth not a lot of Marxists themselves have read Marx, and a guy like Gramsci wasn’t that popular outside of Italy and a few select circles until not that long ago. It baffles me though why people still spend time reading Bourdieu, he reminds me of “champagne socialism”.
- foozed 8y agoI wasn't aware of the term "champagne socialism", thanks for sharing that.