It was not ruled either way - instead 'the Court held that penalizing the baker for this refusal to violate his religious convictions violated the principle tha

It was not ruled either way - instead 'the Court held that penalizing the baker for this refusal to violate his religious convictions violated the principle that the government "cannot act in a manner that passes judgment upon or presupposes the illegitimacy of religious beliefs and practices." The Court emphasized the fact that the State of Colorado had permitted three other bakers to refuse to provide cakes that expressed sentiments opposed to same-sex marriage, condemning this disparity in treatment as demonstrating hostility to religious views.' [0] 0: https://reason.com/volokh/2018/06/17/more-on-masterpiece-cakeshop-from-prof-m https://reason.com/volokh/2018/06/17/more-on-masterpiece-cak...