3 ms·
This benefits the drivers at the expense of consumers. Maybe that's worth doing, maybe not. I don't think there is a right answer to that since it depends on yo
by jeffreyrogers 8y ago
This benefits the drivers at the expense of consumers. Maybe that's worth doing, maybe not. I don't think there is a right answer to that since it depends on your perspective. In either case, it seems like the problem they're trying to address is congestion, which could be better addressed by taxing drivers more highly. Then only the more productive rideshare and taxi drivers would be on the streets, plus you'd get rid of a lot of the other drivers who don't value their ability to drive that highly. I used to drive into NYC fairly regularly, since I liked being able to park near where I was going, but if it cost more I would have just taken the train and the subway.
- test6554 8y agoThe number of drivers finds equilibrium on its own. Too many drivers = too low wages, so people stop driving. Too few drivers = high wages/wait times, so more people become drivers.
- jeffreyrogers 8y agoIt doesn't solve the congestion problem though since lots of drivers are on the road for other reasons.
- techsin101 8y agoCongestion problem stems from broken Subway system. Uber is just responding to pain. Uber is like pain medicine for broken bone that subway system is.