3 ms·
Right, it is almost always possible to do anything. In practice I would rather have to change the includes on one file to get it to compile with musl rather th
by abenedic 8y ago
Right, it is almost always possible to do anything. In practice I would rather have to change the includes on one file to get it to compile with musl rather than change the includes on 10+ files each with a different change. It is a matter of degree not kind of difficulty. But in general I always will prefer the issues that arise from a single file implementation rather than the issues from many files.[Sorry if this is phrased poorly, I am not a native speaker.]