2 ms·
>"When you have a human working with AI, they always beat the AI. That's super powerful." This isn't always the case. The best Centaur Chess players (Human + A
by atonalfreerider 8y ago
>"When you have a human working with AI, they always beat the AI. That's super powerful."
This isn't always the case. The best Centaur Chess players (Human + AI) still lose to the best AI: https://www.chess.com/news/view/stockfish-outlasts-nakamura-3634 https://www.chess.com/news/view/stockfish-outlasts-nakamura-...
- munin 8y agoI wish more people knew this! There's a very middle-brow response to "well we've got system A, and system B, so obviously the combination will be better than A or B alone!" but this doesn't need to be the case. People think it's this way because of chess but that was apparently an anomaly.
- drivers99 8y agoIt compared "the latest development build [of top chess engine Stocktish] compiled for OS X and running on a 3ghz 8-core Mac Pro." vs a highly ranked player and "the assistance of an older version of Rybka (about 200 points less than Stockfish's 3200+ rating), and it ran on a 2008 MacBook." I think the question is how does a top AI compare to the same top AI + (skilled?) human.