3 ms·

1) tech companies employ people at will and engage in profit shifting 2) I did jump to two plausible solutions to what you were describing, true. 3) You did s

1) tech companies employ people at will and engage in profit shifting 2) I did jump to two plausible solutions to what you were describing, true. 3) You did say tech companies shouldn’t be the arbiter of content people put on there. I said I _want_ then to be the arbiter given terrorists use the platform. It’s a fair point that the thing you are saying is wrong has literally been going on for years, and the only difference is that now its someone you disagree with less being censored. I reread and feel my comments were fair, you are subscribing to free speech at “Alex Jones” cost (effectively any). As well, I am engaging in an honest discussion, we just disagree.

mistermann 8y ago
> tech companies employ people at will and engage in profit shifting Your claim was: "The tech companies are _significantly_ right wing on any spectrum including countries outside the USA". Structuring your company to maximize financial returns is hardly a good representative of the complexity of right/left leaning in the aggregate. > I did jump to two plausible solutions to what you were describing, true That's a rather generous characterization of what you wrote. > You did say tech companies shouldn’t be the arbiter of content people put on there. Please quote the part where I said that. > the only difference is that now its someone you disagree with less being censored This is your imagination playing tricks on you again. Review everything that has been written here, and find the most compelling words I've written that substantiate this claim. I think you might be surprised. > you are subscribing to free speech at “Alex Jones” cost (effectively any) Once again, your imagination is projecting ideas onto your mental representation of me. To test whether this is true, review the conversation and find where I said anything remotely advocating "subscribing to free speech at “Alex Jones” cost (effectively any)". There is a way out of this situation, but it isn't a zero effort endeavor.

mistermann 8y ago

> tech companies employ people at will and engage in profit shifting Your claim was: "The tech companies are _significantly_ right wing on any spectrum including countries outside the USA". Structuring your company to maximize financial returns is hardly a good representative of the complexity of right/left leaning in the aggregate. > I did jump to two plausible solutions to what you were describing, true That's a rather generous characterization of what you wrote. > You did say tech companies shouldn’t be the arbiter of content people put on there. Please quote the part where I said that. > the only difference is that now its someone you disagree with less being censored This is your imagination playing tricks on you again. Review everything that has been written here, and find the most compelling words I've written that substantiate this claim. I think you might be surprised. > you are subscribing to free speech at “Alex Jones” cost (effectively any) Once again, your imagination is projecting ideas onto your mental representation of me. To test whether this is true, review the conversation and find where I said anything remotely advocating "subscribing to free speech at “Alex Jones” cost (effectively any)". There is a way out of this situation, but it isn't a zero effort endeavor.