The right to self defense is indeed natural, nobody argues that. What I debate is that _method_ of such defense. Instead of weaponizing someone in a weaponized

The right to self defense is indeed natural, nobody argues that. What I debate is that _method_ of such defense. Instead of weaponizing someone in a weaponized environment, does it not make far more sense to de-weaponize the environment? Instead of giving everyone glass-proof shoes, why not just sweep the floor? Taken another way, would you also support publishing your bank account credentials if everyone else did as well? "Incorrect. Making bank account credentials widely available is indeed compatible with respect for ones wealth. Ones wealth is worth being defended. One may disagree, but the right to protecting ones wealth is a natural, inalienable right".