3 ms·
Yes, but we want the coal to be displaced. Not the nuclear.
by darawk 8y ago
Yes, but we want the coal to be displaced. Not the nuclear.
- nostrademons 8y agoCoal already has been displaced. The reason there's less of a downturn is because there's a lot less of it to begin with: https://www.iso-ne.com/about/key-stats/resource-mix/ https://www.iso-ne.com/about/key-stats/resource-mix/ There's 20x more nuclear than coal energy in New England. Proportionally, the drop in coal energy (~50%) was a lot more than the drop in nuclear energy (~15%).