2 ms·
Read-it-later software seems surprisingly hard to monetize given how few are in the space. Pocket, Instapaper and Pinboard seem to be the only valid players. T
by AJRF 8y ago
Read-it-later software seems surprisingly hard to monetize given how few are in the space. Pocket, Instapaper and Pinboard seem to be the only valid players.
The ability to facilitate "archiving a webpage" seems to be simple, but read-it-later software needs to be more than that to the modern internet user it seems.
It needs to;
+ Save video and images
+ Most people require a TTS service of sorts
+ Even more people want text-extraction (and boy-oh-boy this is hard)
+ Cross-platform apps & syncing
Where are the big costs here?
Is it;
1. Scale (Syncing all that multimedia must be expensive)
2. Talent (doubt it's this all the teams seem to be extremely small teams)
3. AI & Scraping development (Most services are poor in their offerings here, not sure its this)
I've been thinking about the space a LOT and started to try and develop some pieces of software that eventually I hope people will be able to stitch together into something great.
When i've observed problems like this before it seems that eventually a large open source project comes along and kills the markets chance of generating any money, and read-it-later services seem to fit in that fuzzily-defined-in-my-head-only market segment.