3 ms·
Rights have to have priority over security, for without rights, there is no security. The rights are, despite there being debate about how to interpret them (t
by thwarted 16y ago
Rights have to have priority over security, for without rights, there is no security. The rights are, despite there being debate about how to interpret them (that's what the judicial branch is for), spelled out, whereas anything can be done in the name of security, including attempts to take away rights.