It was leading the discussion in a decidedly political direction, which was why I only responded with an observation about the community experience of the accou

It was leading the discussion in a decidedly political direction, which was why I only responded with an observation about the community experience of the account. It's not even that he's lying or citing bad data. It's the conclusions he's drawing from it that I find suspect. He seems to be closely mirroring the talking points of a certain controversial public figure. A figure who only seems to be bothered by the wholesale corporate exploitation of the working class when it benefits a foreign country.