> So these are errors that should have been caught by the compiler but were not? Some of them yes, others no. For example, the compiler can't statically guaran

> So these are errors that should have been caught by the compiler but were not? Some of them yes, others no. For example, the compiler can't statically guarantee that there are no divisions by zero. > If I hit a divide by zero error in an edge-case branch of code, I will still want my process restarted no? Sure, and so Inko may at some point have a system for running "clean up" code of sorts, to report the error, etc. Actually restarting of things is something I prefer to have done by a system daemon, as there is no guarantee a program can continue after a panic (e.g. memory might be corrupted based on the nature of the panic).