Because your arguments are ridiculous, and you are referencing directly to material that points out very clearly that exposure to asbestos carries a risk of hea

Because your arguments are ridiculous, and you are referencing directly to material that points out very clearly that exposure to asbestos carries a risk of health hazard, for the people exposed. "In general" people who become ill from inhaling asbestos have been regularly exposed in a job where they worked directly with the material ??? If there is even the risk that a single person could fall ill because of unintentional exposure, then it should be ground enough for a blanket ban. It's like saying that smoking should be allowed again in public places, since "in general", people that get cancer are first-hand smokers.