Maybe we have? The article says "the other differences were not significant", but that does not mean there was no difference. It means "there was not enough e

Maybe we have? The article says "the other differences were not significant", but that does not mean there was no difference. It means "there was not enough evidence to reject the assumption that there were no other differences". That's one problem with this kind of statistics: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but people (including head line writers) act as if it was.