3 ms·
Yes and no I suppose. When it's unrelenting, ubiquitous (politicians and waiters) and in everything he ever composes, I'd consider it a weakness. Of course you
by mattmaroon 16y ago
Yes and no I suppose. When it's unrelenting, ubiquitous (politicians and waiters) and in everything he ever composes, I'd consider it a weakness.
Of course you don't expect anyone to talk exactly as people do, with umms and ahs and all that. But Steinbeck and Hemingway (and in film, most of the people I mentioned in my original post) prove that you can write great drama and dialogue with a good degree of realism.
Also many people did speak similar to Shakespeare's characters, though of course with less rhyming since they weren't poets and Shakespeare was. There's a good explanation of that here "http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_people_really_speak_the_way_they_did_in_Shakespeare%27s_plays http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_people_really_speak_the_way_th...
- pohl 16y agoJust like Claude Monet and those big, unrealistic blobs of paint. Such a weakness.
- mattmaroon 16y agoMonet never feels cliche, even all these years later. Sorkin starts to after a few episodes.