4 ms·
Not terribly interesting from an Apple perspective but I did find this illuminating. "But as enforcement loosened, notably under the Reagan administration, buy
by eldenbishop 8y ago
Not terribly interesting from an Apple perspective but I did find this illuminating.
"But as enforcement loosened, notably under the Reagan administration, buybacks began to increase. Now, they are omnipresent. A Roosevelt Institute study released on Tuesday found that corporations spent 60 percent of their net profits on stock buybacks between 2015-2017."
Sixty percent of profits on AVERAGE from 2015-2017 (across all corporations? US?).
Compound this with statistics (same article) that see no long term stock benefit from these short-term injections and you have a broken system of incentives with a generation of executives playing games with bonuses. It reminds me of all these studies criticising code metrics like lines-of-code as producing nothing useful except extra verbose code.
- perl4ever 8y agoCan you explain why a buyback of $X is worse than a dividend of $X? For the company or for the world. (Apart from being taxed slightly differently, maybe) Is the way investing is supposed to work that investors give people money and they never give it back?