3 ms·
I wanted to look at the actual numbers and see how close the findings were, but I don't see the study linked nor the title of the study (I do see a different st
by PurpleBoxDragon 8y ago
I wanted to look at the actual numbers and see how close the findings were, but I don't see the study linked nor the title of the study (I do see a different study, but it isn't the one those numbers are from).
A different article someone else linked seemed to have the study, but it is behind a pay wall.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1800097115 http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1800097115
This seems to have the actual numbers though.
http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2018/07/31/1800097115.DCSupplemental/pnas.1800097115.sapp.pdf?bcsi_scan_e37e3cdb4dc1fe17=guyu7gXOKbf8P6pHGjl97AiZQwMPAAAA9MepTg==&bcsi_scan_filename=pnas.1800097115.sapp.pdf http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2018/07/31/1800097115...
I'm having trouble grasping how to read the tables (especially given it seems Female Physician Female Patient is repeated twice on tables S2 and S3, but I think that is just a title error.
Here are the numbers, best as I can grasp.
S2 is full, S3 is matched
Mean then standard deviation.
M/MS2:.881/.114
M/MS3:.870/.124
M/FS2:.854/.353
M/FS3:.861/.121
F/MS2:.887/.120
F/MS3:.867/.130
F/FS2:.857/.116
F/FS3:.862/.112
Figure S2 looks interesting (M/F and F/F seem equal while M/M seems better than F/M), but I'm not sure what the real axis are.
Edit: formatting