The article to me seems to be pushing a specific viewpoint which is essentially jumping to a conclusion that male doctors treat women patients poorly. Without

The article to me seems to be pushing a specific viewpoint which is essentially jumping to a conclusion that male doctors treat women patients poorly. Without context these numbers don’t mean anything. There could be many factors why these statistics exist - are older / more severe female cases more likely to see a male doctor? As an example. I really dislike this being presented as news and having all sorts of negative connotations towards men. It’s a finding that requires more investigation and is meaningless without context.