3 ms·
It doesn't have to be direct manipulation, and it doesn't have to further a government agency's goals. It could be a voluntary self-interested act by SpiderOak,
by philipov 8y ago
It doesn't have to be direct manipulation, and it doesn't have to further a government agency's goals. It could be a voluntary self-interested act by SpiderOak, and they should still have trust removed.
- zipwitch 8y agoOh, I agree that they cannot now be trusted. I was just trying to indirectly make the point that from our POV SpiderOak acknowledging they made a mistake, or them deliberately covering for a NSL look identical.