2 ms·
If they can MitM you to see your post, base64 will just draw more attention. Consider checking SSL fingerprints from trusted and untrusted locations instead.
by LinuxBender 8y ago
If they can MitM you to see your post, base64 will just draw more attention. Consider checking SSL fingerprints from trusted and untrusted locations instead.
openssl s_client -servername news.ycombinator.com -connect news.ycombinator.com:443 < /dev/null 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -fingerprint -noout -in /dev/stdin
SHA1 Fingerprint=BB:DD:64:6F:EB:11:0C:D5:EC:CF:57:D1:F7:52:AA:99:50:1B:44:FD
I would also suggest browser addons that will alert you when SSL fingerprints change, but they don't work in FF any more, so you will have to do it manually understanding that they can swap out certs based on tcp packet size. You can also pin the cert, understanding you will have to update it if HN changes out their certs or they expire.
- anticensor 8y agoSHA1 Fingerprint=BB:DD:64:6F:EB:11:0C:D5:EC:CF:57:D1:F7:52:AA:99:50:1B:44:FD HN is not replaced by MiTM in Turkey. They cannot read HTTPS unless it is using TÜBİTAK certificate (all .gov.tr and some other .tr domains use this). There are more layers of censorship till central gateway, which is inferior to, but structurally more robust than GFWoC.