We need to hope that Tim O'Reilly can invent a better term. I'm quite serious. "Web 2.0" may have been an amorphously defined grab-bag of a concept, and some p

We need to hope that Tim O'Reilly can invent a better term. I'm quite serious. "Web 2.0" may have been an amorphously defined grab-bag of a concept, and some people didn't like it, but at least it didn't get itself confused with a W3C standards document. If you call something "Web 2.0 compliant" people tend to recognize that you are kidding.